London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (25 016 920)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices because further consideration of this complaint would not lead to a different outcome and we are satisfied with the actions the Council has taken in response to the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complained the Council failed to respond properly to her representations against three PCNs. Miss Y says this led to her being unable to appeal to the London Tribunals.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide further investigation would not lead to a different outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.
  3. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y and the Council provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. When Miss Y approached us, she told us that she was seeking the cancellation of the two PCNs the Council issued. In the Council’s response to Miss Y’s complaint in December 2025, it agreed to accept her representations for both PCNs, which the Council has now cancelled.
  2. As this remedy has been provided, and is the remedy Miss Y sought, it is unlikely further consideration of this complaint would lead to a different outcome. Further, the remedy provided is appropriate to the alleged injustice caused by its fault and is in line with our guidance on remedies, so we are satisfied with the actions the Council has taken in response to the complaint. For these reasons we will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because further consideration of this complaint would not lead to a different outcome and we are satisfied with the actions the Council has taken in response to the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings