Essex County Council (25 016 036)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council failing to consider his appeal after he paid a penalty charge notice which he would like refunded. This is because there is no evidence of a significant injustice to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. In short, Mr X complains about the Council failing to consider his appeal after he paid a penalty charge notice for straying into a bus lane.
  2. Mr X says he has fined the Council £35 for providing misleading information. Mr X wants his payment of £35 refunded as he says the Council’s documents say if you win the appeal, it will repay any monies paid.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Because Mr X admits straying into the bus line and paying the PCN, he has lost his rights of appeal including any informal consideration by the Council outside of the statutory appeals procedure.
  2. While it is open to the Council to cancel the fine at any time, the statutory process expects dissatisfied complainants to appeal ultimately to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (as outlined in paragraph four) before paying. There is no option to pay and then appeal. Notwithstanding all of this, Mr X’s claimed injustice of £35 does not represent a significant enough injustice to warrant an investigation as we only investigate the most serious complaints.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint seeking a refund of his £35 payment because the amount is not significant enough to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings