Sheffield City Council (25 014 786)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint into the Council’s refusal to issue a resident’s parking permit for Mr B’s property. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion to investigate.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council refused to issue a resident’s parking permit for his property. In 2022, the Council agreed to issue permits to Mr B because it said it made mistakes which previously led to Mr B obtaining a permit.. The Council said this agreement would not apply to future owners of the property. Mr B says he has lost two house sales as the Council said buyers could not have a parking permit. He is complaining about the Council’s decision-making process.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a Council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B has complained the Council will not issue permits to future residents of his property and says this will make it difficult to sell his home. However, I consider Mr B’s complaint about this matter late. A complaint is late if it has taken someone more than 12 months to complain to the Ombudsman. The Council told Mr B in 2022 that his property was designated as car free. It also made it clear at the time the offer to issue Mr B with a permit was not transferable to subsequent residents of the property. I see no good reason to exercise discretion to investigate this matter now as Mr B could have complained to the Ombudsman sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings