Bristol City Council (25 013 770)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Feb 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council not approving an application for a disabled parking bay. This is because it is unlikely an investigation by the Ombudsman would add to the Council’s response or achieve anything more for Mr X.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s failure to approve his application for a disabled parking bay outside his house. Mr X applied for the parking bay due to his wife’s health conditions and says the Council’s decision to refuse his applications have impacted her safety and quality of life.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X believes the Council failed to consider all the factors in his case when deciding not to approve his application for a disabled parking bay.
  2. The Council has now reviewed that decision and approved a disabled parking bay near Mr X’s house. This remedies the injustice caused by the alleged fault and I consider it unlikely an investigation by the Ombudsman would achieve anything more for Mr X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is unlikely an investigation by the Ombudsman would add to the Council’s response or achieve anything more for Mr X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings