Luton Borough Council (25 013 172)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 13 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because we are satisfied with the actions already taken by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Council sent him a Penalty Charge Notice with an incorrect time listed compared to the CCTV evidence of the alleged contravention. Mr Y believes this is fraudulent and evidence tampering.
  2. Mr Y says the issue has affected his mental health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y complained to the Council about a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) he had received which displayed the incorrect time for a contravention. The Council’s complaint response agreed that, due to a human error, the PCN time was incorrect. It agreed to cancel the PCN as a result. Mr Y however, feels that this is evidence that the Council is tampering with its evidence and should not have issued the PCN at all.
  2. Our role, if we find fault, is to make recommendations to try to put the person in the position they would have been in had the fault not occurred. In this case, if the error had not occurred Mr Y would have received a PCN with the correct time listed in the documentation. As the Council has cancelled the PCN in response to the complaint, Mr Y is in either the same, or a potentially better position than if the error had not happened. Consequently, and as the remedy is in line with our guidance on remedies, we are satisfied with the steps the Council has already taken in response to the complaint. We will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because we are satisfied with the actions already taken by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings