Luton Borough Council (25 012 331)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the installation of a dropped kerb in the wrong place. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has installed his dropped kerb in the wrong place. He wants it widened at no cost to himself.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X applied for a dropped kerb to enable him to park two cars in front of his home.
  2. From the information I have seen, the Council’s contractor visited Mr X’s home. Markings were painted on the pavement to show the limits of the dropped kerb.
  3. Mr X electronically signed a document on the contractor’s mobile phone. He says this was only to confirm the contractor had visited the site. However, the Council says the electronic document included reference to the proposed location of the dropped kerb and measurements as indicated by the markings on the pavement. It says the markings are painted on site as the applicant requests (if permitted) and the agreement document is signed to confirm the location.
  4. The photographs of the site taken at the time show the markings for the proposed location of the dropped kerb. The photograph of the installed dropped kerb provided by Mr X shows the installation appears to conform with the markings shown in the photographs taken at the time of the site visit.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint as there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council. This is because the markings on the road which were agreed by Mr X at the site visit and the installed dropped kerb appear to match. It is open to Mr X to ask the Council to widen the kerb and pay the relevant fee if the Council agrees to the work.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings