London Borough of Haringey (25 011 235)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because she could have followed the statutory process and appealed to a tribunal. It is reasonable to expect Miss X to have followed this process.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about how the Council handled a Penalty Charge Notice for driving in a bus lane. Miss X says it was sent to the wrong address so she did not have a chance to pay the charge at the reduced rate.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X says the Council issued a Penalty Charge Notice after she drove in a bus lane in 2023. She says it went to an old address, so she was not aware of the charge until 2025 by which time the debt had increased.
  2. The Council said it sent the original Penalty Charge Notice to the address provided by the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency. It said it was Miss X’s responsibility to keep her address updated. In February 2025 the Council issued an Enforcement Notice which gave Miss X an opportunity to challenge the charge.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because she could have followed the statutory process and appealed to a tribunal. It is reasonable to expect Miss X to have followed this process.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings