London Borough of Brent (25 010 903)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of an appeal against a penalty charge notice. This is because Mr X has used his right to challenge the Council’s escalation of the case at court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains he appealed against a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) with the Council but did not receive the Notice of Rejection. This led to him losing his right to appeal the PCN in front of a tribunal, and to the Council instructing enforcement agents to recover payment from him. He says this caused him financial hardship and distress. He wants the Council to refund his payment for the PCN.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The courts have said that where someone has sought a remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, we cannot investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)
  2. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) is part of Northampton County Court. It considers applications from local authorities to pursue payment of unpaid PCNs and from motorists to challenge local authorities’ pursuit of unpaid PCNs.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Where a motorist makes representations against a PCN but does not receive a response they may apply to the TEC to make a late witness statement/statutory declaration. The TEC has the power to order the issuing authority to take the process back to an earlier stage, reinstating their right of appeal against the PCN and reducing the amount owed.
  2. Mr X has told us he applied to the TEC to make a late witness statement and the restriction in Paragraph 2 therefore applies.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint as Mr X has sought a remedy with the TEC.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings