Wakefield City Council (25 010 236)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to install parking bays near her home. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision not to install parking bays near her home. The Council decided it would not do so because of trees in the area.
  2. Mrs X said the matter caused her frustration and distress.
  3. Mrs X wants the Council to remove the trees and create more parking.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X asked the Council to install parking bays near her home. The Council explained it would not install parking bays in the area because of its policy regarding trees. The area Mrs X would like the Council to change to parking is currently occupied by trees. The Council said it would not remove the trees unless they posed a risk.
  2. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether you disagree with the decision the organisation made.
  3. The Council implemented its policy and explained its reasoning. There is insufficient evidence of fault. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings