London Borough of Sutton (25 009 783)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because the complainant could have appealed to the tribunal.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes the correspondence about the PCN. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Mr X with a PCN for parking on the pavement. Mr X challenged the fine and said he had broken down. He sent a receipt from a garage. The Council did some checks and found the garage had denied attending and found that Mr X’s statement about a breakdown was not supported by CCTV. The Council rejected the challenge and told Mr X he could pay the fine or appeal to the tribunal. The Council also told Mr X he could ask the tribunal for a late appeal if he had missed the deadline. It would be for the tribunal to decide whether to accept a late appeal.
  2. I will not start an investigation because Mr X could have appealed to the tribunal. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal because the tribunal is the appropriate body to consider PCN appeals. The Council notified Mr X of his appeal rights and the tribunal is free to use. If appropriate, the tribunal has the power to cancel a PCN – we do not have that power.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because Mr X could have appealed to the tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings