London Borough of Lambeth (25 009 140)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about two penalty charge notices because the complainant has used her right to submit a witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre. We therefore have no power to consider the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council refused to cancel two parking penalty charge notices (PCNs) despite providing evidence that she held a valid parking permit. She complains the Council refused her appeal about the first PCN, failed to respond to her contact and incorrectly increased the PCN before she sent her appeal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)
  3. The courts have said that where someone has sought a remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, we cannot investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)
  4. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) is part of Northampton County Court. It considers applications from local authorities to pursue payment of unpaid PCNs and from motorists to challenge local authorities’ pursuit of unpaid PCNs.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X disputes two PCNs. She had a right of appeal to the TEC, which she has used as she has made a witness statement to the TEC. This process allows motorists to challenge a council’s escalation of a PCN. We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint, including the extent to which it concerns the Council’s decision to increase the PCN charge, because she has already appealed to the TEC.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint about two penalty charge notices because the complainant has used her right to submit a witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre. We therefore have no power to consider the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings