Birmingham City Council (25 008 886)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Nov 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to provide Mrs X with a disabled parking bay. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council, and we cannot achieve the outcome Mrs X seeks.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained the Council has refused her application for a disabled parking bay outside her property. Mrs X said she needs this because she has children with high levels of care needs.
  2. Mrs X said she currently has to park away from her property and has difficulties walking back home with her children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained the Council refused her application for a disabled parking bay outside her property. Mrs X said she needs this due to her children’s additional care needs.
  2. The Council refused the application because it said Mrs X did not meet one of the required criteria of not having existing parking restrictions outside the property.
  3. The Council’s criteria states it will not provide a parking bay where there are already parking restrictions in place.
  4. Mrs X’s property is therefore not eligible and given the Council has acted in line with its policy, there is not enough evidence of fault in its decision making to warrant our involvement.
  5. Additionally, as an outcome to Mrs X’s complaint, she wants the Council to provide her with a disabled parking bay. The Ombudsman cannot tell the Council to do this and therefore we cannot achieve the outcome sought by Mrs X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and we cannot achieve the outcome sought.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings