Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a parking penalty charge notice as Mr X could have appealed it to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

The complaint

1. Mr X complains the signs at a leisure centre where he is a member are not clear in respect of member parking. Mr X disputes a parking penalty charge notice (PCN) the Council issued to him when he parked at the location.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

4. I considered information provided by the complainant.
5. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

6. Parliament has provided an appeal mechanism by which Mr X could have challenged the PCN, ultimately to an independent tribunal, the Traffic Penalty Tribunal (TPT). It would have decided whether the PCN should be cancelled given the points Mr X raises about the signs at the location. We are not another level of appeal and are not empowered to make such determinations. It is reasonable therefore to expect Mr X to have appealed to the TPT and we will not therefore investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

7. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because It is reasonable to expect him to have appealed the PCN to the TPT.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman