London Borough of Barnet (25 005 998)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to cancel a penalty charge notice. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council refused to cancel a penalty charge notice (PCN) for a prohibited left turn which Mr X says was the result of a medical emergency.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We are not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong.
  2. While I have no doubt Mr X has complex health conditions as he claims it is clear from the information he has provided that the Council considered these in dealing with his representations against the PCN. It ultimately decided these health conditions did not provide grounds to cancel the PCN but this is a decision it was entitled to reach and I have seen no evidence to show it was affected by fault. We cannot therefore criticise it.
  3. Mr X reports that the amount of the penalty charge has now increased but this is the result of non-payment and compliance with the statutory process, rather than any fault by the Council. We could not therefore say the Council must reduce or waive the amount owed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings