London Borough of Havering (25 005 423)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because the complainant can appeal to the tribunal and because his complaint about the handling of the issue has been resolved.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, says the Council has not responded to his challenge about a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). He is worried he will lose his appeal rights to the tribunal.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.
  3. It is our decision whether to start, and when to end an investigation into something the law allows us to investigate. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X challenged a PCN but did not get a reply. He complained to the Council and said he was worried he would lose his appeal rights. The Council decided not to accept his complaint because there is a statutory process to challenge PCNs.
  2. In response to my enquiries the Council reviewed the case and decided it should have accepted the complaint because Mr X was complaining about the process. The Council apologised to Mr X for declining to consider the complaint and for any confusion and inconvenience.
  3. In the meantime, the parking service had responded to Mr X about the PCN. Mr X plans to appeal to the tribunal.
  4. I spoke to Mr X. He confirmed he will appeal to the tribunal and is satisfied with the response to his complaint.
  5. I will not start an investigation because Mr X can appeal to the tribunal which is the appropriate organisation to consider disputes about PCNs. I will not investigate the complaint handling because the Council has apologised and the substantive issue, the PCN, is for the tribunal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because Mr X can appeal to the tribunal and because the complaint about the complaint handling has been resolved.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings