Manchester City Council (25 004 949)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a council-run car park. This is because the injustice Mrs X claims is not the result of any fault by the Council. If Mrs X believes the Council is responsible for the losses she suffered then it would be reasonable for her to make a claim against it a court.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains a council car park advertised as secure with CCTV and security does not have CCTV cameras throughout the car park to safeguard against break-ins and theft. Her car was broken into while parked at the car park and Mrs X is unhappy the Council has refused to accept liability.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We cannot hold the Council responsible for the criminal actions of third parties. We could not therefore say the Council is responsible for the break-in of Mrs X’s car or the theft of her personal belongings, and we cannot say it must provide Mrs X with compensation for her losses. If Mrs X believes the Council is responsible it would be reasonable for her to make a claim against it at court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the injustice Mrs X claims is not the result of any fault by the Council. If Mrs X believes the Council is liable for her losses it would be reasonable for her to go to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings