Durham County Council (25 003 687)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about parking and other matters as the complainant is not caused a level of injustice that would justify our further involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s response to his complaints:
      1. that a neighbour’s parking amounts to trespass as items attached to the vehicle overhang his hard standing,
      2. about a boundary fence which he says poses a danger to children,
      3. that a vehicle parked on Council land encroached into his hedge,
      4. about an unanswered query about land ownership, and
      5. that wheelchair users are unable to use lowered kerbs in his road as people park their cars across them
  2. Mr X says he has been caused trouble by these problems and is unhappy that the Council hasn’t assisted or in some cases, responded.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X’s complaints a) and c) are matters between him and the drivers concerned, that is, civil matters, not matters for the Council
  2. While I recognise Mr X may feel strongly about the other complaints, he is not caused a level of personal injustice from these that would warrant our further involvement. We have limited resources and must direct them to cases of serious personal injustice.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaints because he is not caused a level of personal loss or harm from them that would justify our further involvement. Some of his complaints are also civil matters.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings