Royal Borough of Greenwich (25 003 552)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing him penalty charge notices for a vehicle which is not his. This is because the Council has taken action to correct the fault, and it is unlikely further investigation would achieve anything more for Mr X.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained that the Council was repeatedly sending him Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) for a car which did not belong to him. This caused him to spend time challenging the errors through the appeals process.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued Mr X four PCNs which were clearly not related to him or his car. Mr X appealed against each PCN successfully through the initial stages of the appeals process and the Council cancelled the PCNs.
  2. The Council says it has now identified the reason for the PCNs, which were the result of an internal error, and has delivered training internally to prevent PCNs being incorrectly issued in future. Since that time, the Council has not issued further PCNs to Mr X.
  3. I appreciate that having to appeal against multiple PCNs was frustrating for Mr X, but I am satisfied the Council’s actions provide a suitable remedy for the complaint. It is therefore unlikely further investigation would achieve anything more for him.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the Council has taken sufficient action to identify the cause of its error and remedy the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings