London Borough of Tower Hamlets (25 003 267)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 18 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council pursuing recovery action for an unpaid penalty charge notice when the complainant had a ‘breathing space’ agreement in place. The Council proposed satisfactory action to address the complaint, in accordance with the complainant’s desired outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council pursuing enforcement action for an unpaid penalty charge notice (PCN), whilst he was under a ‘breathing space’ agreement (also known as a debt respite scheme).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. So, we may decide not to start an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council, which included an update from the Council on the status of enforcement case.
  2. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to our enquiries, the Council provided a copy of a letter it sent to Mr X in July 2025, after he had contacted the Mayor for assistance. This confirmed a system glitch had caused the PCN to escalate to an enforcement agent, with associated costs/charges being added. The Council offered to reduce the PCN amount back to £130, with the associated costs also being removed.
  2. This is the outcome Mr X was seeking when he complained to the Ombudsman, and, with reference to paragraph 2 above, we would regard this as a satisfactory way to address the complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because his desired outcome has been offered by the Council, and this is a satisfactory way to resolve the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings