London Borough of Ealing (25 002 645)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about demand notices the Council sent Mr X over unpaid penalty charge notices. There is no evidence of fault and Mr X did not experience an injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council sent him two demands for unpaid penalty charge notices he received in 2020.
  2. He says the demands were unexpected and caused him shock and emotional distress. He wants £1,000 compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X received two parking charge notices in 2020. He did not pay them and so they were recorded at the County Court and Orders for Recovery of the Unpaid Debts were served on Mr X.
  2. The Council contacted Mr X about these debts in 2024 but took no further action.
  3. Subsequently, the warrants for both debts expired and the Council wrote to tell Mr X this in January 2025.
  4. We will not investigate this complaint. Mr X received two parking charge notices which he did not pay. The Council was entitled to contact him to seek payment. It later informed him the warrants had expired and so the debt could no longer to recovered. There is no evidence of fault and Mr X did not experience an injustice. Indeed, it could be argued Mr X benefitted from the Council’s actions as he no longer has to pay the fines he owed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no evidence of fault and Mr X did not experience an injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings