London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (25 002 323)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about enforcement agents because the complaint is late without good reason to exercise discretion to investigate it now.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained that bailiffs, acting on behalf of the Council, clamped his work vehicle, forcing him to pay £624 for an unpaid Penalty Charge Notice, in order to have the clamp removed despite this being against the law. He is also unhappy with the Council’s failure to respond to his complaint.
  2. Mr Y says the issues have caused him distress and disruption to his work and he felt under duress to pay the £624.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Bailiffs attended Mr Y’s property and clamped his vehicle in November 2023. He complained about this in November 2024, before approaching us in May 2025.
  2. The law says people should normally complain to us within 12 months of becoming aware of an issue. Complaints brought to the Ombudsman more than 12 months after someone becomes aware of something a council has done are considered late. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons.
  3. Mr Y’s was aware of his reason to complain about the Council’s actions when bailiffs clamped his vehicle in November 2023, more than 12 months ago. Consequently, the complaint is now late.
  4. Mr Y’s was aware of his reason to complain about the Council’s actions when his vehicle was clamped in November 2023, more than 12 months ago. Consequently, his complaint is now late.

We have discretion to disapply the rule outlined in paragraph four where we decide there are good reasons. Mr Y has not provided any good reasons why he did not bring the complaint to us within 12 months of knowing about the matter. It is reasonable to expect him to have complained sooner. Consequently, we will not investigate this late complaint now.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because the complaint is late without good reason to exercise discretion to investigate it now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings