London Borough of Hackney (25 002 074)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to remove Mr X’s business vehicle from a public road. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s decision to remove his business vehicle in line with its abandoned vehicle policy.
  2. Mr X said the matter has caused him distress and financial loss.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council after it removed his business vehicle and placed it in a storage facility for abandoned vehicles. Mr X said the vehicle was parked on a private road and the Council should have notified him before removing it.
  2. The Council said the vehicle’s presentation led the officer who attended the site to conclude it had been abandoned. The Council told Mr X the road the vehicle was parked on was a public highway and there is no legal requirement to inform the owner prior to removing a vehicle from a public highway. The Council gave Mr X information about where the vehicle was stored and offered him a reduced collection price.
  3. Mr X remained unhappy with the situation and brought the complaint to us.
  4. The Council has provided Mr X with an explanation for why the vehicle was removed and confirmed that the vehicle was parked on a public highway. There is no evidence the Council was at fault for removing the vehicle. The Ombudsman will not investigate complaints if the evidence indicates we would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to find fault with the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings