Transport for London (24 012 876)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about Transport for London’s escalation of a penalty charge notice. This is because it would be reasonable for Mrs X to wait for the ‘order for recovery’ and apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to make a witness statement/statutory declaration.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mrs X, complains she did not receive a penalty charge notice (PCN) issued by Transport for London (TfL) and missed out on the opportunity to pay the PCN at the initial discounted rate.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) is part of Northampton County Court. It considers applications from local authorities to pursue payment of unpaid PCNs and from motorists to challenge local authorities’ pursuit of unpaid PCNs.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Because Mrs X did not receive the PCN from TfL it would be reasonable for her to wait for TfL to issue an ‘order for recovery’ and apply to the TEC to make a witness statement/statutory declaration. The process is specifically designed to deal with cases such as this and it does not need Mrs X to show any wrongdoing on the part of TfL. If Mrs X’s application is successful the TEC can take the process back to an earlier stage, reducing the amount she must pay. If the TEC refuses her application Mrs X may apply for a review of the decision by a district judge.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would be reasonable for Mrs X to take the matter to the TEC.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings