Nottingham City Council (24 011 331)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about parking provision because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Council has failed to prevent cars belonging to local workers from parking on the road near his home. Mr Y says this means he often struggles to park near his home, causing him distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council responded to Mr Y’s complaint in October 2024. It explained it would give priority to proposals for parking schemes where a sufficient number of residents would benefit from the use of the resources, in particular to cost from such a scheme. It said that presently, Mr Y was the only resident to request a parking scheme so at present his road would be a low priority. It agreed to keep Mr Y’s request on file with others, but would not act at that time.
  2. As the Council has considered Mr Y’s request, including relevant criteria such as cost and benefit to residents, and have made him aware of a different parking scheme under which he can receive a resident permit, the request has been properly decided and we would not find fault. We will therefore not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings