Hampshire County Council (24 004 270)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Jul 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s enforcement of a penalty charge notice as the complainant can ask the courts to consider her case.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained the Council sent enforcement agents to her home about an unpaid penalty charge notice (PCN). Ms X complained she had not received prior notices about the PCN and that the council refused to send her copies. Miss X says this has caused her distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Parliament has provided a mechanism by which motorists can challenge the enforcement of PCNs when something may have gone wrong in the enforcement process. In Ms X’s case, it was open to her to ask the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC), which is part of the county court system, to consider her case. The Council advised Ms X of this in its e-mail to her of 7 June 2024. It is reasonable to expect Ms X to have followed this procedure and as per paragraph two we will not therefore investigate.
  2. The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) is the UK's independent data regulator and is best placed to assess how the Council dealt with Ms X’s request for copy documents.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she could reasonably have asked the TEC to consider her case and the ICO is best placed to address her concerns about information rights.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings