Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council (23 015 589)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Jan 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it was reasonable for Mr B to put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Council wrongly issued him with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for an alleged parking contravention. Mr B says he parked correctly and the Council is wrong to say his vehicle overhung double yellow lines. Mr B says the PCN is not valid and he should be refunded the money he paid to cancel the PCN.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. A motorist who receives a PCN for an alleged parking contravention has two options. The motorist may pay the PCN to cancel it. Alternatively, the motorist may dispute the PCN by making representations to the Council, and if needed, by putting in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. Once a motorist has paid a PCN they can no longer challenge the PCN by putting in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
  2. If Mr B wanted to challenge this PCN he could have put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal rather than pay the PCN.
  3. This is the process set out in law to challenge a PCN. I find it was reasonable for Mr B to do this. The Tribunal is independent and in the best position to decide whether a PCN was properly issued including whether any restrictions were appropriately signed. Also, the process is free and relatively straightforward to use.
  4. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it was reasonable for him to put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings