London Borough of Redbridge (23 001 109)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it was reasonable for Mrs X to appeal to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains that the Council wrongly issued her with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for an alleged parking contravention.
  2. Mrs X says she displayed her Blue Badge but one corner was slightly folded over. She says she is seriously ill and feels the Council has treated her unfairly. Mrs X would like the Council to refund the £100 paid.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals (previously known as the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service) considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Parliament has laid down a detailed process allowing individuals the right to challenge receiving PCNs from the Council.
  2. Mrs X made formal representations to the Council after receiving a Notice to Owner. The Council rejected Mrs X’s formal representations, and it was open to her to put in an appeal to London Tribunals to challenge the PCN.
  3. I find it was reasonable for Mrs X to use this process to challenge the PCN. The tribunal is in the best position to decide if the PCN was correctly issued. It is not our role to provide an alternative right of appeal after Mrs X paid the charge. So, I will not investigate this complaint.
  4. Further, we do not investigate complaints about the complaint responses from the Council if we are not investigating the main issue. As this is not a good use of public money.
  5. And, we have no powers to compel the Council to refund £100 Mrs X has paid.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it was reasonable for her to appeal to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings