Transport for London (22 018 084)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Apr 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the amount the Council is requiring Mrs X to pay for two penalty charge notices as this is set out in law and we cannot question it.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains Transport for London (TfL) asks her to pay the full amount for two penalty charge notices (PCNs) it issued to her for driving in a low emission zone. Mrs X wants to be able to pay the initial, reduced amount and to pay in instalments. Mrs X also complains about conflicting information she says TfL has given her in respect of agreeing an instalment plan.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X chose to appeal against the PCNs rather than paying them in the period when a reduced charge applied. By choosing to appeal, Mrs X lost the right to pay the reduced amount and the full amount became due, as indicated by London Tribunals in its decisions on her appeals. We cannot question this as this is the procedure set out in law. We cannot therefore achieve the outcome Mrs X seeks of paying the reduced amounts.
  2. Mrs X says she has spoken to several people at TfL since to try to arrange a payment plan and has been given conflicting information, though Mrs X does say TfL did offer a plan but she initially rejected it. Mrs X now wants to accept that payment plan. I will make the Council aware of this, but I do not consider there is sufficient injustice caused to Mrs X from this aspect of her complaint, as a separate matter, to warrant our further involvement.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome she seeks.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings