London Borough of Enfield (22 010 514)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Nov 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it is reasonable for Mrs X to appeal to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains that the Council wrongly issued her with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for an alleged parking contravention. Mrs X says she was waiting in her car for a van to finish unloading. She says she is ill and feels like the Council has treated her like a criminal. Mrs X would like the Council to cancel the PCN and provide training to the parking warden.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals (previously known as the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service) considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Parliament has laid down a detailed process allowing individuals the right to challenge receiving PCNs from the Council.
  2. Mrs X may make formal representations to the Council by waiting to receive a Notice to Owner. If the Council rejects Mrs X’s formal representations, she may put in an appeal to London Tribunals to challenge the PCN.
  3. I find it is reasonable for Mrs X to use this process to challenge the PCN. The tribunal is in the best position to decide if the PCN was correctly issued. It is not our role to provide an alternative right of appeal. So, I will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to appeal to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings