London Borough of Southwark (22 007 266)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Sep 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his representations against six penalty charge notices. This is because Mr X has used his right of appeal to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council failed to properly consider his representations against six penalty charge notices (PCNs) for moving traffic contraventions at two separate locations. He says the Council failed to consider his mitigating circumstances or to exercise its discretion not to pursue the PCNs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. We may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal but cannot investigate if the person has already appealed. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X disputes the PCNs issued by the Council. He made representations against them to the Council and appealed to London Tribunals. His concerns primarily relate to the fairness of pursuing him for six PCNs and the adequacy of the Council’s signage warning of the restrictions he contravened.
  2. The Council has explained it is the motorist’s duty to ensure they comply with any restrictions that are in place and this is correct. Mr X suggests it is not fair for the Council to rely on the restrictions as he believes the Council’s signs are inadequate. But London Tribunals has considered the adequacy of the signs as part of Mr X’s appeal. We cannot therefore investigate the matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his representations against the PCNs. This is because Mr X has used his right of appeal to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings