London Borough of Tower Hamlets (21 017 358)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice. Mr X appealed against it to London Tribunals and so the matter is no longer within our remit.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about a penalty charge notice (PCN) the Council issued to him. Mr X seeks redress for the time and trouble he was put to in challenging the PCN. Mr X also wants the Council to refund other motorists who received similar PCNs and to remove ambiguous parking restriction signs across the Borough.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X was issued with a PCN for parking without a permit. Mr X successfully appealed against the PCN to London Tribunals as the adjudicator concluded that the legend on the sign at the location where Mr X parked, did not accurately implement a parking regime invoked by the Traffic Management Order in place.
  2. Mr X seeks redress for the stress and time and trouble he has experienced in dealing with the PCN
  3. As per paragraph two, as Mr X used his right of appeal against the PCN, we now have no legal remit to investigate. Mr X had the right to make a costs application to the Tribunal to cover his expenses.
  4. Mr X considers the Council has deliberately installed ambiguous parking signs across the Borough to generate revenue. Mr X wants the Council to remove such signs and to refund other motorists who have incurred PCNs at those locations.
  5. There is no indication that Mr X has complained to the Council about this. Before we will consider a complaint, we must allow the Council the chance to respond. Mr X therefore needs to first raise this with the Council.
  6. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint arising from a PCN as it is no longer within our remit to do so since Mr X’s appeal. Mr X’s broader complaint needs to be put to the Council in the first instance.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings