London Borough of Newham (21 013 667)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because there is not significant enough injustice to justify our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complains the Council wrongly issued him with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) and did not respond to his appeal. Miss X, Mr Y’s daughter says this has caused her father upset and increased stress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information Miss X provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council issued a PCN to Mr Y in September 2021. Mr Y appealed the PCN online. Miss X says no response was received from the Council. She then telephoned the Council and was told that the PCN had been cancelled in December 2021. Miss X complained to the Council on her father’s behalf as he had not received a response to his appeal.
  2. The Council responded in December, confirming the PCN had been waived on appeal and referring Mr Y to us.

Analysis

  1. Miss X says Mr Y was caused upset and increased levels of stress when he received the PCN, particularly as he has heart problems. While Miss X feels strongly about the issue and Mr Y may have been upset by the PCN, Mr Y was able to successful appeal the PCN with the Council.
  2. Any upset caused in the Council issuing the PCN and the subsequent appeal is not significant enough to justify our involvement. Consequently, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because there is not significant enough injustice to justify our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings