Transport for London (20 010 631)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Feb 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: Mr X complains about Transport for London issuing him with a Penalty Charge Notice and its handling of the representations he made against it. We cannot not investigate the complaint because Mr X appealed to the London Tribunals and so the complaint falls outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, complains about the Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) issued to him by Transport for London (TfL) and about its handling of the representations he made against it. He says the issuing of the PCN was unfair and that he should have had help from TfL with his representation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals (previously known as the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service) considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. In considering the complaint I reviewed the information provided by Mr X and TfL. I gave Mr X the opportunity to comment on my draft decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. TfL issued Mr X with a PCN for a parking offence. Mr X says he made a Representation against the PCN. TfL says it has no record of him challenging the PCN through the representations and appeals process. As no payment or representation was received an order was made to recover the outstanding debt from Mr X.
  2. Mr X then filed a Witness Statement with the London Tribunals to challenge the PCN on the basis that he had not received a Notice of Rejection from TfL in response to his representation. The Tribunal considered his case but directed Mr X to pay the charge which he subsequently did.
  3. TfL has advised us that Mr X did not make it aware of any disability that would have prevented him from making representations in the prescribed manner.

Assessment

  1. Mr X appealed his case to the Tribunal and having done so we cannot investigate his complaint as it falls outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint. This is because Mr X appealed to the London Tribunals and so the compliant falls outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings