Transport for London (19 019 829)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about a penalty charge notice. This is because he has used his right of appeal to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about a penalty charge notice (PCN) issued by Transport for London (TfL). The PCN has cost him more than £500.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. We may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal but cannot investigate if the person has already appealed. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. London Tribunals (previously known as the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service) considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I reviewed Mr X’s complaint and London Tribunals’ decision on his appeal.

Back to top

What I found

  1. TfL issued Mr X two PCNs in 2019 for driving in the congestion charging zone without paying the charge. Mr X made representations against both PCNs but while TfL accepted his representations in one case it refused them in the other. Mr X appealed against the PCN which TfL refused to cancel but London Tribunals dismissed his appeal. Mr X complains TfL was inconsistent in its approach to his representations against the PCNs and would like it to cancel the second PCN and refund his payment to the bailiffs.
  2. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint. Mr X’s injustice stems from the PCN and because he has appealed against this we have no jurisdiction to investigate the matter.
  3. Mr X suggests he did not receive London Tribunals’ decision and says he was unaware TfL was pursuing the case until its enforcement agents (bailiffs) contacted him demanding payment. But it was London Tribunals which issued the decision on his appeal and not TfL. Mr X may complain to London Tribunals if he believes it has not acted properly or alternatively he may wish to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC) to make a late statutory declaration to challenge TfL’s escalation of the case.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint. This is because Mr X has appealed to London Tribunals.

Investigator’s final decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings