London Borough of Waltham Forest (19 015 127)
Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 24 Feb 2020
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate this complaint about bailiffs removing the complainant’s car. The complainant has sought a remedy in court.
The complaint
- The complainant, who I refer to here as Mr B, has complained bailiffs acting for the Council wrongly removed his car.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- The law says we cannot investigate a complaint when someone has sought a remedy in court; we have no discretion in this. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
- The courts have decided this restriction applies even if the court action did not provide a remedy for all the claimed injustice.
How I considered this complaint
- I have considered what Mr B said in his complaint and background information provided by the Council.
What I found
- The Council employed bailiffs to collect an unpaid penalty charge for a motoring contravention. They removed Mr B’s car despite him insisting he was not the owner of the car at the time of the contravention.
- Mr B made a claim in court against the bailiffs. Both sides agreed to settle the matter by mediation and it has been closed.
Final decision
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman