Hampshire County Council (25 010 941)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council asking her to remove trees she planted in a verge. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council have asked her to remove trees and artificial grass she added to the verge outside her house. Mrs X says she wants to prevent parking there as it blocks access to her driveway.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council asked Mrs X to remove the trees she planted in its verge. Mrs X complained people are parking there and blocking her drive. She asked the Council to reconsider.
  2. The Council considered the evidence Mrs X provided. It said the trees could grow too large for the space, would be a maintenance burden for the Council and had not been given permission. It considered Mrs X’s request for other parking prevention measures but said, due to cost, it prioritises based on safety and number of people impacted.
  3. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. We look at the process a council followed to make its decision. If the Council followed its process correctly, we cannot question that decision, even if a complainant disagrees with the decision made. I see no evidence of fault in how the Council reached its decision to ask Mrs X to remove the trees and artificial grass from its verge.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings