East Riding of Yorkshire Council (25 009 909)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to parking enforcement. There is not enough evidence of fault, and we cannot achieve the outcome Miss X is looking for.

The complaint

  1. Miss X said the Council did not do enough to prevent her driveway being blocked by other motor vehicles. She said the enforcement officers did not always work at the correct hours, and it was a poor service. Miss X said she was frequently inconvenienced.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council, saying it needed to do more to ensure her driveway was free from obstructions, outside of normal working hours. She also asked it to consider an option where homeowners could report obstructions by themselves.
  2. The Council explained how it approached parking contraventions and how it deployed its civil enforcement officers (CEO’s). It also said it had arranged for patrols on Miss X’s street, and invited her to continue to report matters of concern.
  3. Given the Council’s replies, there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating this complaint. Whilst it is inconvenient for Miss X, the Council has explained it prioritises those areas with high levels of traffic and cannot always commit a CEO to minor residential roads.
  4. In any case, we could not direct the Council on how to deploy its resources so could not achieve the outcome Miss X is looking for.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. There is not enough evidence of fault, and we cannot achieve the outcome Miss X is looking for.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings