Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (25 009 257)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Aug 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that his car was damaged because of the Council’s decision to locate a cycle hire area in the wrong location. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to put in a compensation claim to the Council, and if needed, pursue the claim at court.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains his car has been damaged because of the Council’s decision to locate a cycle hire area in an inappropriate location. Mr B says bikes left in this area recently toppled over and caused extensive damage to his car. Mr B would like the Council to pay for the required repairs to his car.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. We do not normally investigate complaints about damage to property. This is because in effect such complaints are that an organisation has been negligent. Negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts.
  2. Mr B may put in a compensation claim to the Council’s insurers for the damage to his vehicle. If Mr B is not satisfied with the outcome of his claim, he may pursue his claim at court. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to do this. Only the courts can decide if an organisation has been negligent and make an order for damages.
  3. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to take the Council to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings