Wakefield City Council (25 009 000)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to install an H-bar marking on the road outside Miss X’s property. The injustice claimed is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council refused to install a H-bar marking on the public highway outside her property. Miss X said an H-bar marking would prevent inconsiderate motorists from obstructing access to her driveway via a dropped kerb.
  2. Miss X said this caused her difficulty in accessing her driveway.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained the Council refused to install a H-bar marking which she said would improve her ability to access her driveway via a dropped kerb.
  2. While H-bar markings can warn motorists of the need to keep access-ways clear they are not legally enforceable. Councils have the power to issue penalty charge notices where vehicles are obstructing a dropped kerb but it can do this with or without an H-bar marking in the road.
  3. While Miss X believes an H-bar marking would improve the situation she faces, I do not consider the Council’s refusal to install one causes her significant injustice. This is because Miss X’s injustice stems from the inconsiderate actions of motorists and the installation of an H-bar marking neither prevents such actions nor gives the Council any additional powers to deal with them. For this reason, we will not investigate this complaint.
  4. If Miss X believes cars have obstructed her driveway, she may report this to the Council and, if possible, its parking enforcement contractor may be able to visit to determine whether it can issue a penalty charge notice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because the injustice claimed is not significant enough to warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings