King's Lynn & West Norfolk Council (25 003 090)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the settlement offered by the Council’s insurers for damage to his vehicle caused by one of its contractors. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council’s contractor crashed into his car, writing it off. The Council’s insurers have settled Mr X’s claim but Mr X says this falls short of the valuation of his car. He therefore claims he has lost more than £4,000.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. If Mr X was unhappy with the amount offered by the Council’s insurers he could have asked for more. If the insurers refused, it would have been reasonable for him to make a claim at court for the additional amount.
  2. It is not for us to determine claims for damages or to decide if the amount offered by the Council’s insurers is sufficient. Insurance payouts often fall below the cost of replacing a vehicle and motorists may take out further insurance, known as ‘GAP insurance’, to protect against this.
  3. The Council has also advised Mr X he may complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service about its insurer’s handling of his claim.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings