Worcestershire County Council (24 021 989)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 24 Apr 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about highway maintenance because another body is better placed.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complained the Council has refused to pay for repairs to a fence after it failed to maintain the surrounding hedgerow and verge which caused damage. She is also unhappy at the Council’s handling of her complaint, where she says she has had to chase for responses.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss Y made a claim against the Council’s insurance for repairs to her fence, which she says was damaged by overgrown hedges which were not maintained by the Council. She says the repairs cost her £1,180. She also disputes responsibility for the maintenance of a grass verge.
  2. The Council has rejected Miss Y’s claim. If Miss Y wishes to pursue the matter, it is for her to approach the court to contest the Council’s position on liability. We are not able to decide liability or award damages. Consequently, any claim for damages, such as costs for repairs, which Miss Y considers the Council to be responsible for, are matters more appropriately dealt with by the courts. It is therefore reasonable for Mr Y to pursue his claim through her own home insurer or the courts. We will not investigate this complaint.
  3. As we are not investigating the substantive issue, it is not a good use of public funds to investigate how the Council dealt with Miss Y’s complaint about the fence. We will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because another body is better placed to consider the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings