Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (24 011 636)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr C’s complaint about the Council’s vehicle crossover policy. This is because we cannot achieve the outcome he wants.

The complaint

  1. Mr C complains about the Council’s vehicle crossover policy which does not allow a crossover if it would remove a grass verge which is over 2 metres deep. Mr C says this restriction is arbitrary and not proportionate, and meant his application was refused. Mr C says the Council should change this part of the policy to allow for grass verges of over 2 metres to be removed if mitigation is offered by the applicant.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr C and have read the Council’s vehicle crossover policy, which is available on the Council’s website.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has explained its policy in response to Mr C’s complaint. The Council explained that it had recently considered making changes to this policy, similar to what Mr C has suggested, but, it decided not to alter this part of the policy.
  2. It is for the Council to decide its policy on vehicle crossovers. It is not the role of the Ombudsman to tell the Council it should operate a different policy. So, an investigation would not achieve the outcome Mr C wants.
  3. Mr C may make this suggestion to the Council when the Council next reviews this policy.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because we cannot achieve the outcome Mr C wants.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings