Transport for London (24 011 483)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Authority’s staff because the courts and insurers are better placed to consider the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Authority’s staff were disrespectful to him when he had become lost and needed help. Mr Y says the incident triggered a psychological episode which caused him significant distress and is looking to be compensated for the emotional damage caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The legislation from which the Ombudsman takes their power also places some restrictions on what we may investigate. One of these concerns negligence claims about damage to property or personal injury. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts.
  2. In this case, Mr Y says the behaviour of the staff caused him to have a psychological episode and he is seeking compensation for the emotional damage and inconvenience caused to him. This compensation can also be called damages.
  3. We cannot decide liability claims for negligence or award damages, such as the compensation Mr Y is seeking for the injury to his health he says was caused by the Authority. This would need to be decided by either the Authority’s insurer or the courts if liability is disputed. Mr Y can begin this process by making a claim against the Authority’s insurance. As the insurer and the courts can decide liability, and award damages, which we cannot, they are better placed to consider this complaint and we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because the courts and insurers are better placed to consider the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings