Surrey County Council (24 011 355)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to repair a road sign. This is because the issue does not cause him significant injustice and we cannot investigate the alleged waste of public funds as the law bars us from considering complaints about matters which affect ‘all or most’ of the people in a council’s area.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has failed to repair a new ‘variable message sign’ and wasted public funds by visiting the wrong sign and claiming it had been repaired when it hadn’t.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate something that affects all or most of the people in a council’s area. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(7), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not investigate all the complaints we receive. In deciding whether to investigate we need to consider various tests. These include the alleged injustice to the person complaining. We only investigate the most serious complaints.
  2. I appreciate Mr X is frustrated with the Council’s failure to repair the sign but the issue does not cause him significant personal injustice. We will not therefore investigate the matter further.
  3. Mr X claims the Council has wasted public funds in dealing with the issue but this is not something we can consider further. This is because the impact on public funds is a matter which affects ‘all or most’ of the people in the Council’s area.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the issue does not cause Mr X significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings