Suffolk County Council (23 018 535)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to protect the public’s right of use of his neighbour’s land. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and we cannot achieve any worthwhile outcome for Mr X.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has failed to take action against his neighbour for obstructing access to land which has in the past been used as a turning place.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. As the local highway authority the Council has a duty to protect public rights including the right of access to the public highway. But the land concerned in this case does not form part of the public highway; it is private land owned and maintained by Mr X’s neighbour. The Council therefore has no basis to insist the neighbour removes the obstruction and allows people to use it to turn their vehicles around.
  2. It is clear the issue here causes Mr X significant inconvenience and frustration but this is not the result of any fault by the Council. We could also not achieve any worthwhile outcome for Mr X as we cannot say it must do as Mr X wants.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and we cannot achieve any worthwhile outcome for Mr X by investigating the matter further.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings