London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (21 011 240)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a claim of damage to Mr X’s car windscreen caused by adhesive from a parking penalty notice. It is reasonable for Mr X to submit an insurance claim and if liability is not accepted, to seek a remedy in the courts.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council fixing a parking penalty notice to the windscreen of his car which left behind a sticky residue. He says this is criminal damage and that the Council should compensate him for the damage.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that when the Council fixed a parking penalty notice to his car windscreen it left sticky residue when removed and he has been unable to remove it with soap and water. He submitted a formal complaint, but the Council says it will not accept this for a claim.
  2. Mr X says the Council has caused criminal damage to his windscreen and should compensate him for this.
  3. The Ombudsman will not normally investigate complaints about damage to property or injury to people arising from claims of negligence. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts. It is normal procedure for persons suffering damages or personal injury caused by a council or its contractors to submit an insurance claim against the Council. This will then be treated as a claim, rather than a complaint and passed on to its insurers or legal team for a response on liability.
  4. If no liability is accepted then it is reasonable for the complainant to seek a remedy by way of the courts.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about a claim of damage to Mr X’s car windscreen caused by adhesive from a parking penalty notice. It is reasonable for Mr X to submit an insurance claim and if liability is not accepted, to seek a remedy in the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings