Essex County Council (20 007 832)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Dec 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to grant an application for a dropped kerb. This is because the decision does not cause Mr X significant personal injustice and it is unlikely we could achieve any worthwhile outcome for him.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council wrongly approved an application for a dropped kerb for a property on his road. He is concerned about the impact the dropped kerb will have on road safety.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we believe:
  • it is unlikely we would find fault, or
  • the fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • the injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I reviewed Mr X’s complaint and the Council’s response. I shared my draft decision with Mr X and considered his comments.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X lives on Road Y. He complains the Council wrongly granted permission for a dropped kerb to one of his neighbours. He says the road is dangerous and that a resident died after being hit by a car while crossing the road.
  2. While Mr X is concerned about the possible impact on road safety this is not a significant enough injustice to warrant investigation. The accident Mr X refers to was not related to a parking manoeuvre and the property it serves is some distance from his home. It is also unlikely we could achieve any worthwhile outcome by investigating the complaint as the dropped kerb appears to have been completed and we cannot say the Council must revoke its permission and remove it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. This is because the issue does not cause Mr X significant injustice and it is unlikely investigation could achieve any worthwhile outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings