London Borough of Lewisham (26 000 073)
Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 22 Sep 2026
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled Mr X’s complaint about the height of speed bumps near his home. This is because we have decided any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.
The complaint
- Mr X complained the Council failed to respond to his complaint about the height of speed bumps on a road near his home. He said the speed bumps had forced him to drive at single digit speeds and was concerned they are damaging his car. He wanted the council to apologise and respond to his complaint.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- People may complain to us about injustice caused by:
- ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ by a public organisation we could investigate; or
- the actions of an organisation in connection with privately arranged adult social care.
(Local Government Act 1974, section 26A(1) or section 34C(1)(a)).
- We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), or section 34B(8)).
- We will not normally investigate complaint handling if we are not investigating the rest of the complaint. This is because there is not usually enough injustice to justify us doing so. We collect information about particularly poor complaint handling practice and report this back to organisations. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), or section 34B(8)).
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr X complained speed bumps close to his home meant he could only drive over them at single digit speeds.
- In its complaint response, the Council told Mr X the speed bumps in question were within the allowed height range. The Council advised Mr X how he could raise a claim with its insurers, if there was any damage to his vehicle from the speed bumps.
- The law means we can choose only to investigate a complaint where the person has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures by the body complained about. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the alleged loss or injustice is not a serious or significant matter.
- I recognise the circumstances of Mr X’s complaint has affected them, but this is not significant enough to warrant us investigating.
- We will not investigate the way the Council handled the complaint and correspondence here because we are satisfied it did not cause enough separate injustice to warrant it.
Final decision
- We will not investigate this complaint because any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman