Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (25 028 652)
Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 06 Mar 2026
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint that her car was damaged by a broken drain cover which the Council had failed to repair. This is because it is reasonable for Miss B to pursue her compensation claim at court.
The complaint
- Miss B complains her car was damaged by a broken drain cover which the Council failed to repair. Miss B says the Council has wrongly refused her claim for compensation. Miss B would like the Council to pay her compensation for the costs she had to pay because of this incident.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Miss B.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- The Council as a local highways authority has a statutory duty to maintain adopted streets. The Council is expected to routinely monitor the state of highways and carry out repairs where necessary. But importantly, the level of maintenance, frequency of inspection, and threshold for repair is not set out in law and is open to interpretation.
- We do not normally investigate complaints about vehicle damage caused by highway disrepair. This is because in effect such complaints are that an organisation has been negligent. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. Negligence claims are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts.
- Miss B has received the Council’s decision on her compensation claim. Miss B may pursue her claim by taking the Council to court.
- Deciding whether an organisation has been negligent usually involves looking rigorously, and in a structured way at evidence as only the court can to make its findings. Also, unlike the courts, we have no powers to enforce an award of damages.
- So, I would usually expect someone in Miss B’s position to seek a remedy in the courts. I find it is reasonable for Miss B to do this. The initial fee for making a claim is relatively modest and Miss B may seek legal advice if needed.
- So, we will not investigate this complaint.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to take the Council to court.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman