Transport for London (25 023 847)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that the Authority is taking too long to pay his compensation claim after his car was damaged by a pothole. This is because an investigation would not be a good use of our limited resources.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains the Authority’s contractor is taking too long to settle his compensation claim after his car was damaged by a pothole. Mr B would like the contractor to reimburse his repair costs of £135.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about claim or complaint procedures, if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We generally take the view compensation claims for damage to property are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts. Only the courts can decide if an organisation was negligent, and if so, make an order for damages.
  2. We would not normally investigate a complaint solely about an organisation’s handling of a compensation claim. This is because an investigation is unlikely to be a good use of our limited resources or achieve a significant outcome which would justify our involvement.
  3. The information suggests the Authority’s contractor intends to settle Mr B’s claim and was in touch with Mr B relatively recently in late November 2025. Any delay is not so excessive that it would justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.
  4. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because an investigation would not be a good use of our limited resources.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings